model comparison

vs

Beam vs Mercury 3

Reflection against Inception, compared on listed price, real workload cost, context and capabilities.

the short answer

  • Mercury 3 lists lower input and output prices.
  • Mercury 3 reads cached input for less ($0.01/M against Beam's $0.015/M), which decides the bill for agents that resend long context.

side-by-side specs

specBeamMercury 3
providerReflectionInception
input price$0.125/M$0.1/M
output price$0.4/M$0.35/M
cached input$0.015/M$0.01/M
blended price (3:1)$0.194/M$0.163/M
context window1M tokens1M tokens
max output128k tokens131.072k tokens
inputtexttext
structured outputyesyes
weightsopen (Apache 2.0)closed
releasedOctober 2026October 2026

same work, both models

workloadBeamMercury 3
one chat reply3,000 tokens in, 500 outBeam costs 1.2× as much as Mercury 3$0.00058$0.00048
summarise a 100-page report50,000 tokens in, 1,500 out, one request$0.0069$0.0055
1,000 classification calls500 tokens in, 20 out, per call$0.07$0.06
coding-agent session2M tokens in across ~60 turns, 60,000 out, no cache$0.27$0.22
same session, cached85% of input read from the prompt cache, the rest written to itBeam costs 1.3× as much as Mercury 3$0.09$0.07

at listed rates. token counts are typical sizes, not measurements.

Mercury 3 pricing notes

  • the listed price is Inception's 50% launch rate; the standard rate is $0.20 / $0.70, and no end date is announced.
  • cached input bills at $0.01 per 1M tokens, 90% off the input rate.

when to pick which

Beam

the first open-weights model from Reflection, a 501B-total, 23B-active mixture-of-experts built for agentic tool use, coding and general reasoning. it reads text only and its weights ship under Apache 2.0.

pick it if

  • you want a long-window text model priced with the flash tier
  • you want Apache 2.0 weights, with BF16, FP8 and NVFP4 builds to self-host
  • you run tool-calling agents on text and repeat long prompts, so cached input matters

skip it if

  • you need image, audio or video input; Beam reads text only
  • long autonomous coding is the job; its reported DeepSWE v1.1 score sits below GLM-5.3 Flash and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

Mercury 3

Inception's Mercury 3 is a text-only diffusion llm with selectable reasoning effort and a 1M-token context window. it replaces Mercury 2.5 at lower input and output rates, with the window up from 260K tokens.

pick it if

  • you need low-cost text work across contexts up to 1M tokens
  • latency matters; Inception cites 1,068 tokens/s on NVIDIA GPUs
  • your prompts repeat, so cached input bills at a tenth of input

skip it if

  • you need image input
  • you need stable long-term rates; the launch discount has no announced end date

faq

which is cheaper, Beam or Mercury 3?

Mercury 3 lists lower input and output prices. on a coding-agent session (2M tokens in, 60,000 out) Beam costs $0.27 and Mercury 3 $0.22.

can i switch between Beam and Mercury 3 mid-task?

yes. in an octomind session, /model octohub:beam and /model octohub:mercury-3 switch models without losing the conversation, so you can draft on one and review on the other.

try either model

switch between models inside the same octomind session.

prices from the catalog of 2026-11-09