xAI's model for coding and knowledge work, launched September 2026 as the successor to Grok 4.6 at the same price and speed. It takes text and images, and reasoning is always on.
Pick it if
you want xAI's top model for coding and multi-hour terminal tasks
your prompts repeat: cached input bills at a quarter of the input rate
you need text and image input in one 500K window
Skip it if
Grok Build 0.1 fits your work: half the input, a third the output price
you need a non-reasoning mode: reasoning on Grok 4.7 cannot be disabled
Anthropic's mid-tier Claude model, which Anthropic describes as its best combination of speed and intelligence. It succeeds Sonnet 5 at the same $2 / $10 rate, with a 1M-token context and half the cache-read price, and sits below Opus 5.5.
Pick it if
you want Claude at half of Opus 5.5's per-token price
you resend long prompts; cache hits bill at 5% of input
your prompts need a 1M-token window at the standard rate
Skip it if
Haiku 5.5 handles your high-volume classification or routing more cheaply
your code forces tool use or sets temperature; both return errors
FAQ
Which is better, Grok 4.7 or Claude Sonnet 5.5?
On Terminal-Bench 4.0, as each maker reports it, Grok 4.7 scores 37.6% and Claude Sonnet 5.5 70.6%. These are each maker's own numbers, not a controlled head-to-head; the spec table lists every benchmark both publish.
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Claude Sonnet 5.5?
Grok 4.7 lists the lower output price; input prices match. On a coding-agent session (2M tokens in, 60,000 out) Grok 4.7 costs $4.36 and Claude Sonnet 5.5 $4.60.
Which has the larger context window?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 offers the larger context window. Grok 4.7: 500k tokens; Claude Sonnet 5.5: 1M tokens.
Can I switch between Grok 4.7 and Claude Sonnet 5.5 mid-task?
Yes. In an Octomind session, /model octohub:grok-4.7 and /model octohub:claude-sonnet-5-5 switch models without losing the conversation, so you can draft on one and review on the other.
Try either model
Switch between models inside the same Octomind session.