model comparison

vs

Inkling 2 Small vs GLM-5.3 Flash

Thinking Machines against Zhipu AI, compared on listed price, real workload cost, context and capabilities.

the short answer

  • on DeepSWE v1.1, as each maker reports it, Inkling 2 Small scores 72.1% and GLM-5.3 Flash 63.4.
  • GLM-5.3 Flash lists lower input and output prices.
  • GLM-5.3 Flash offers the larger context window.

side-by-side specs

specInkling 2 SmallGLM-5.3 Flash
providerThinking MachinesZhipu AI
input price$0.3/M$0.15/M
output price$1/M$0.5/M
cached input$0.03/M$0.03/M
blended price (3:1)$0.475/M$0.237/M
context window256k tokens1M tokens
max output—128k tokens
inputtext, imagestext, images, video
structured outputnoyes
weightsclosedopen (MIT)
releasedNovember 5, 2026August 2026
DeepSWE v1.1 (maker-reported)72.1%63.4

same work, both models

workloadInkling 2 SmallGLM-5.3 Flash
one chat reply3,000 tokens in, 500 outInkling 2 Small costs 2.0× as much as GLM-5.3 Flash$0.0014$0.0007
summarise a 100-page report50,000 tokens in, 1,500 out, one request$0.02$0.0083
1,000 classification calls500 tokens in, 20 out, per call$0.17$0.09
coding-agent session2M tokens in across ~60 turns, 60,000 out, no cache$0.66$0.33
same session, cached85% of input read from the prompt cache, the rest written to itInkling 2 Small costs 1.6× as much as GLM-5.3 Flash$0.20$0.13

at listed rates. token counts are typical sizes, not measurements.

GLM-5.3 Flash pricing notes

  • Z.ai's 50% promo ($0.075 / $0.25) ended 2026-09-09 16:00 UTC; the listed price is the standard rate.

when to pick which

Inkling 2 Small

Inkling 2 Small is Thinking Machines' second-generation 594B-total, 17B-active mixture-of-experts model with image input. its weights are closed for now; the lab plans an Apache 2.0 release. on octomind it is served only through Tinker.

pick it if

  • want the lowest-priced Inkling on octomind, below Inkling Small on both input and output
  • need adjustable reasoning effort, with chain-of-thought you can switch off
  • work on long agent runs: the lab trained it with a 256K window plus compaction

skip it if

  • you need open weights today; the lab has not released them yet
  • you need audio input; Inkling 2 Small takes text and images only

GLM-5.3 Flash

the first natively multimodal model in Zhipu AI's GLM-5 series, an open-weights 320B-total, 18B-active sibling of GLM-5.3. it costs about a ninth of GLM-5.3's per-token rate and, unlike GLM-5.3, accepts image and video input.

pick it if

  • you want GLM-5.3-family text at roughly a ninth of the price
  • you need image or video input in the GLM line
  • you want MIT-licensed weights you can self-host

skip it if

  • you need replies without thinking; Z.ai says thinking cannot be disabled

faq

which is better, Inkling 2 Small or GLM-5.3 Flash?

on DeepSWE v1.1, as each maker reports it, Inkling 2 Small scores 72.1% and GLM-5.3 Flash 63.4. these are each maker's own numbers, not a controlled head-to-head; the spec table lists every benchmark both publish.

which is cheaper, Inkling 2 Small or GLM-5.3 Flash?

GLM-5.3 Flash lists lower input and output prices. on a coding-agent session (2M tokens in, 60,000 out) Inkling 2 Small costs $0.66 and GLM-5.3 Flash $0.33.

which has the larger context window?

GLM-5.3 Flash offers the larger context window. Inkling 2 Small: 256k tokens; GLM-5.3 Flash: 1M tokens.

can i switch between Inkling 2 Small and GLM-5.3 Flash mid-task?

yes. in an octomind session, /model octohub:inkling-2-small and /model octohub:glm-5.3-flash switch models without losing the conversation, so you can draft on one and review on the other.

try either model

switch between models inside the same octomind session.

prices from the catalog of 2026-11-09