Mercury 2.5
Its low listed input price makes it a fit for high-volume work and background automation. Vision support fits UI screenshots, browser and visual tasks.
Model comparison
Mercury 2.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Compare listed prices, context windows and vision support.
Side-by-side comparison
| Spec | Mercury 2.5 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Listed input price | $0.04/M | $0.3/M |
| Listed output price | $0.15/M | $2.5/M |
| Context window | 260k tokens | 1M tokens |
| Vision | Yes | Yes |
Good for
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Its mid-range listed input price makes it a balanced daily driver for coding. Vision support fits UI screenshots, browser and visual tasks, while the 1M tokens context window suits large monorepos and long sessions.
Data summary
Mercury 2.5 lists lower input and output prices. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite offers the larger context window. Both models support vision.
Try either model
Switch between models inside the same Octomind session.
Catalog updated 2026-10-17